Category: Driver Review

Golf Equipment Review: Arnold Palmer P-101 Blade Putter

After getting into golf there are things you start to notice that differs it from other games, mostly how equipment changes on an almost monthly basis and trying to not get addicted and spending money out the wazoo. I’ve done counts before and I was really into buying new clubs once in a while. I t wasn’t uncommon to get a new driver every few months or try out new putters or even get multiple golf bags. After moving and consolidating all my gadgets, I decided to dwindle the equipment and use the money to pay greens fees.

I purchased a Never Compromise GM2 Exchange 3 putter a few years back that just sat in my back-up bag and ended up selling it. I went to a local thrift shop last summer and came across some old putters and saw one in a ratty condition but had good potential. I was previously using a Taylor Made Monza Roza mallet putter and wanted to try a blade more regularly. I purchased the Arnold Palmer P-101 putter and took it home to clean off the well-used putter. With the nicks on the head I ended up using some filler paint to cover the blemishes and was able to soap and clean off the original Golf Pride grips that was still in remarkable condition.

Comments: The Arnold Palmer P-101 blade putter has a classic look to it, stands out with a black-colored head with the trademark Arnold Palmer umbrella logo on the far left of the face. It’s heel-toe weighted and the neck is a nice flowing non-plumbers neck flange. I believe the one I have is 33”-34”. The feel is a bit above average and allows for goof swing speed management with a good overall weight to it. Off-hits do result in shorter length, due to the age (I don’t know how old), it’s not one of the recent putters touting high MOI.


It sure is s beauty with its simple and elegant look that I’ve had other golfers comment on the putter’s look that I haven’t had with others. If you like classic blade putters that you don’t often see (*Scotty Camerons* cough), check your local used bins for this club.

Score: 4 out of 5

Golf Equipment Review: Cleveland HiBore XLS Driver

Comments: After selling my last MacTec NVG2 driver (see last equipment review), I decided to go back to the HiBore line from Cleveland after keeping the original version in my bag for close to a year (longest driver in use!), so I ended up with the 2008 Cleveland HiBore XLS version.

I previously tried the driver at a demo day and got good distance and low flight at the time. There was a sale at the local Dick’s Sporting Goods and couldn’t pass up the chance to get another 10.5 degree HiBore with an upgraded aftermarket shaft. Dick’s had for the same price as the stock Cleveland Fujikura Gold, either (in Regular flex) Aldila NV or Graffaloy ProLaunch Blue. I previously had an Aldila NV on my TaylorMade r7460 Draw driver and decided to try the ProLaunch Blue since the shaft seem a bit stiffer since I was looking for a lower launching ball flight.

The one thing I missed from the original HiBore that the XLS didn’t was the great metallic crisp sound off the face. The XLS had a deeper, more hollow sound to it. The sound isn’t as bellowing and muffled as the MacTec NVG2, but doesn’t have the “wow” factor as the original sound. The head is a huge 460cc and the deep scoop and alignment aid is nice. Red/silver graphics on the sole are nice as well.

For performance issues, the XLS is a good follow-up that has finally gotten me to consistently go 235+ yards on hits with some pure hits going up to 245-259 yards. Sweet spot is definitely larger and provides forgiveness that I needed. I routinely hit off center and shots still give considerable distance.

Haven’t been able to compare the XLS to the XLS Monster or the previous XL so I can’t compare the leap from the all-black XL or the huge Monster head.

The Cleveland XLS is recommended for those looking for a good amount of forgiveness and require a sweet spot for off-center hitters. Check your local stores for good prices with upgraded shafts that you may be able to get for around $130.

Score: 3.5 out of 5

GREATEST HITS- Golf Review: Intech Ripper Driver Review: 7/28/08


Since I’ve been slacking on my recent reviews, I’ll be doing some “Greatest Hits” postings of my golf reviews that bring in the highest traffic to MonsterOfTheWeek.com.

Comments: Tried out the Intech Ripper driver (I guess considered Orlimar’s more generic redheaded stepchild by King Par, the same manufacturer as Orlimar, Affinity, and Knight brands) on the course today and I was impressed with it, even my playing partner who was with me was impressed on it’s distance.

I’m a high handicapper at the moment (20+) and currently using a TaylorMade R7 460 draw with 13 degree head and an upgraded Aldila NV 75S stiff flex shaft (I originally got this since I needed fast help with my slices and to get the ball up in the air easier since I had a slow swing speed in the beginning). Now that I’m better handling my swing with a driver I’ve been looking for a lower lofted driver (10.5-11 degrees) with a regular flex since the 13* driver I have pops up in the air too much nowadays. This Intech Ripper driver actually comes with an Aldila shaft. Never heard of this version, it’s a “Reflex” version shaft name with low torque and high modulus (what is that?). Regular flex with reactive technology. Surprised it didn’t come with Winn grips like the John Daly Dunlop drivers also at Walmart at the same price.

So I busted out the Intech Ripper on the first par 4 288 yarder on the course (I did the same course the day before with my TaylorMade) and hit the ball square on to about 235 yards which was on track the same distance I did the other day with my TaylorMade but actually a bit straighter. Good launch angle and good flex on the generic Aldila shaft. I used the driver on about 3 more holes and actually got maybe 10+ yards more than the prior day. Now this is probably that we were on a slower pace so I was able to line up my drives better and got my swing on a groove. There was one hole that I took a couple extra drives to see how much I could belt the Intech Ripper and I got a couple “thunk” sounds but they still went about 150+ yards and stayed pretty fairly on the course. The big positive I can say about the driver is that even though it’s square it sounds like my TM driver with a nice medium pitch “click” sound when hit properly down the fairway and none of the aluminum bat sound as the Sumo2 and FT-i.

Though the Intech Ripper head cover is pretty weird looking, it actually pops on and off super-fast compared to the sock covers, the only thing I see that might go bad is the locking mechanism that attaches to the shaft might wear down and stop clasping to it or that the shaft area it locks into might start scuffing. Looks like the Fury and I think they should have made some minor cosmetic changes to the Fury or the Ripper/Cube body more to show more of a difference between the $40 vs. $250 version better.

The Intech Ripper was used n the driving range today and I’ll have to say for a $40 driver it hit as well as my Taylor Made R7 Draw. I was hoping since it was a regular flex Adila shaft on the Ripper that it’d go a but longer than my TM with a stiff flex Adila NV 75S shaft, it went just as far though around 225-245 yards so it’s the same distance as my current driver. The plus I’d have to say that surprised me was that I got consistent straight draws with only a few draws hit and actually no slices at all which I am prone to. So for the price I’d have to say the club is good, didn’t know the carbon on the head is only a decal! So after use on the course two days and on the driving range this club is good for a high handicapper like me. Just to have another test I will compare my hits using my friend’s Nike Sasquatch driver vs. the Intech Ripper.

Score: 3 out of 5

Golf Review: Intech Ripper Driver Review: 5/10/07

Comments: Tried out the Intech Ripper driver (I guess considered Orlimar’s more generic redheaded stepchild by King Par, the same manufacturer as Orlimar, Affinity, and Knight brands) on the course today and I was impressed with it, even my playing partner who was with me was impressed on it’s distance.

I’m a high handicapper at the moment (20+) and currently using a TaylorMade R7 460 draw with 13 degree head and an upgraded Aldila NV 75S stiff flex shaft (I originally got this since I needed fast help with my slices and to get the ball up in the air easier since I had a slow swing speed in the beginning). Now that I’m better handling my swing with a driver I’ve been looking for a lower lofted driver (10.5-11 degrees) with a regular flex since the 13* driver I have pops up in the air too much nowadays. This Intech Ripper driver actually comes with an Aldila shaft. Never heard of this version, it’s a “Reflex” version shaft name with low torque and high modulus (what is that?). Regular flex with reactive technology. Surprised it didn’t come with Winn grips like the John Daly Dunlop drivers also at Walmart at the same price.

So I busted out the Intech Ripper on the first par 4 288 yarder on the course (I did the same course the day before with my TaylorMade) and hit the ball square on to about 235 yards which was on track the same distance I did the other day with my TaylorMade but actually a bit straighter. Good launch angle and good flex on the generic Aldila shaft. I used the driver on about 3 more holes and actually got maybe 10+ yards more than the prior day. Now this is probably that we were on a slower pace so I was able to line up my drives better and got my swing on a groove. There was one hole that I took a couple extra drives to see how much I could belt the Intech Ripper and I got a couple “thunk” sounds but they still went about 150+ yards and stayed pretty fairly on the course. The big positive I can say about the driver is that even though it’s square it sounds like my TM driver with a nice medium pitch “click” sound when hit properly down the fairway and none of the aluminum bat sound as the Sumo2 and FT-i.

Though the Intech Ripper head cover is pretty weird looking, it actually pops on and off super-fast compared to the sock covers, the only thing I see that might go bad is the locking mechanism that attaches to the shaft might wear down and stop clasping to it or that the shaft area it locks into might start scuffing. Looks like the Fury and I think they should have made some minor cosmetic changes to the Fury or the Ripper/Cube body more to show more of a difference between the $40 vs. $250 version better.

The Intech Ripper was used n the driving range today and I’ll have to say for a $40 driver it hit as well as my Taylor Made R7 Draw. I was hoping since it was a regular flex Adila shaft on the Ripper that it’d go a but longer than my TM with a stiff flex Adila NV 75S shaft, it went just as far though around 225-245 yards so it’s the same distance as my current driver. The plus I’d have to say that surprised me was that I got consistent straight draws with only a few draws hit and actually no slices at all which I am prone to. So for the price I’d have to say the club is good, didn’t know the carbon on the head is only a decal! So after use on the course two days and on the driving range this club is good for a high handicapper like me. Just to have another test I will compare my hits using my friend’s Nike Sasquatch driver vs. the Intech Ripper.

Score: 3 out of 5

Golf Review: Nike Sasquatch Sumo Driver Review- 4/25/07

Comments: A good straight and long driver in good tandem with it’s square sibling th Nike Sumo2. The farthest of all the drivers I tried and fairly straight hits. Good confidence builder able to belt balls long and far, I was really surprised how good this drier was due to the knocks people give the Nike Sasquatch Sumo2 and I didn’t think any club was going to knock out the Hi-Bore XL as my straightest driver tried out.

Monster of the Week’s “MONSTER of the WEAK #1” Award for Best Driver at the demo day goes to: The Nike Sasquatch Sumo.

Rank: #1

Score: 3.85 out of 5

Golf Review: Cleveland Hi-Bore XL Driver Review- 4/25/07

Comments: Good crisp sound after a hit, straight mid-level drives with the Cleveland Hi-Bore XL. This has been my fave of all the drivers with good looks and good distance. I like the matte finish on the head of the club since it is not as explicit in scuffing as the glossy paint finishes as in other woods, important for beginners and those prone to sky marks.

Rank: #2

Score: 3.75 out of 5

Golf Review: Taylor Made Burner (2007) Driver Review- 4/25/07

Comments: A way better driver than it’s cousin the Taylor Made SuperQuad in my opinion and $100 less. Made for bombers with fast swing speeds this one actually took my drives pretty fairly down the middle. The Taylor Made Burner is a bit longer in the shaft length than other clubs, a good buy. Too bad it kinda looks kind of ugly.

Rank: #3

Score: 3.5 out of 5

Golf Review: Maruman Majestic Prestigio FV-R Driver Review- 4/25/07

Comments: The Maruman Majestic Prestigio FV-R driver wowed me since I did not know anything about this company except that it was a prestigious high-end company like Honma for big spenders. This thing looks expensive, the face was super shiny, almost like a mirror. Good sound and straight drives, too bad it costs $1,700.00!

Rank: #4

Score: 2.95 out of 5

Golf Review: Cobra M Speed Driver Review- 4/25/07

Comments: Another Cobra M Speed driver I really wanted to like since it was suppose to be for golfers like me with slow swing speeds and limited range, I thought this was going to blast my drivers at least an extra 10 yards. Nope. Same range as my current driver and it also had a loud aluminum tin sound to it like the square Nike Sumo2 and Callaway FT-i. No thanks to the Cobra M Speed.

Rank: #5

Score: 2 out of 5

Golf Review: TaylorMade SuperQuad Driver Review- 4/25/07

Comments: I previously hit this Taylor Made SuperQuad driver at a pro shop and with all the hype thought this was going to be good since at the pro shop I hit it to a net and it had a good snapping sound to it. After hitting it on the range though, it wasn’t as straight or long as I hoped and for the price I thought was a bit too much, wanted to like it since it looked good like a stealth fighter, but no go.

Rank: #6

Score: 2.5 out of 5